Notes
William Ilbery, London, recorded as working from 1780, diecl
1839. Specialised in watches for the Chinese Market, and
worked closely with contacts itt Switzerland both for movements
and enamel work. Strong commercial and diplomatic ties
between Britain and the Chinese court ensured that many
watches, despite being of Swiss origin, were signed with English
names and marked London. Even the exceptionally talented
Jaquet-Droz established a branch in London to take advantage
of the China trade.
The best period of watchmaking for the Chinese Market
coincides with Ilbery's success - 1 790 - 1830 - and with the work
of the finest enamel artists - Dupont, Richter, Lissignol etc.
Almost without exception, the subjects depicted on these cases
were taken either from classical mythology, Swiss landscape
painting, or based on stories of an allegorical nature - Faith,
Hope, Love etc. Examples with a portrait are virtually unknown
for the time, and until the watch now offered for sale appeared,
only one other was apparently known to have survived. At the
Christie's auction of April 20, 1991 in New York - Important
Clocks and Watches, lot 89 was a virtual pair to the current lot,
but with the back panel depicting a portrait of a Chinese
gentleman, also dressed in formal Court costume (present
whereabouts currently unknown). Although not a pair in the
generally accepted sense (ie. the identical subject but painted in
reverse), they must originally have been commissioned for the
saute customer and presumably the couple depicted in the
portraits. Frequently sequential numbering of the movements
can be found on 'pairs' of watches, but it does not appear to
have been an infallible rule. Since there is no tradition of Swiss
enamellers working in China at the beginning of the 19th
century, it is interesting to speculate as to how the 'master'
portraits were communicated to Europe. Towards the end of
the 19th century, photography was used, and drawings do exist
from the!860's or later (see A. Chapuis, l.a AVlontre Chinoise,
Neuchatel, p.187, fig.148). In view of the rich colouring of the
costume, and the incorporation of flecks of gold to simulate
braid, it seems possible that the port r aits may have been taken
from glass paintings, a technique that enjoyed considerable
popularity in China. Plate glass mirrors were exported from
Europe to be partially decorated with the same technique and
returned for framing in the chinoiserie style.